It's easy to imagine how the micro-video app could change sexting and amateur porn As Twitter’s new video-sharing app battles the inevitable proliferation of porn, I can’t help wondering what Vine could mean for the future of sexting and amateur smut. (I mean, aside from the prospect of an annoying new portmanteau to describe the act of digitally sharing naked media.) This question is admittedly a bit premature — Vine, which limits clips to six seconds, doesn’t offer a way to privately and directly share videos — but it’s easy to imagine such a development, if not on the part of the app’s makers than by some enterprising tech vulture. And while the app has begun blocking searches for terms like “sex” and “NSFW,” presumably to avoid violating Apple’s puritanical standards, loads of X-rated material is still available; it’s just harder to find. (One must know which accounts to follow, or get creative with keyword and username searches.) There’s already at least one independent NSFW site compiling naughty vines, and the app’s only been around for a few days.What makes me ask the question isn’t the fact that users are already using the app for sexual ends — that happens with virtually all new technology — but rather that it hits the sexual sweet spot of our time. Just last month, I wrote about the rise of GIF porn. At the time, I said, “It should come as no surprise, I suppose, that as our thoughts are distilled into 140 characters, our porn is similarly reduced to 256 colors.” Porno-GIFs are more interesting than a photo but require less time investment than a video — and Vine porn only improves upon that formula, better satisfying our desire for high stimulation with low commitment. It’s also way easier to make than a GIF; and it combines recent trends in porn (amateur porn, gonzo clips, tube sites) with the increasing insta-broadcast of every single thing in our lives. Tracy Clark-Flory is a staff writer at Salon. Follow @tracyclarkflory on Twitter and Facebook.
As Twitter’s new video-sharing app battles the inevitable proliferation of porn, I can’t help wondering what Vine could mean for the future of sexting and amateur smut. (I mean, aside from the prospect of an annoying new portmanteau to describe the act of digitally sharing naked media.) This question is admittedly a bit premature — Vine, which limits clips to six seconds, doesn’t offer a way to privately and directly share videos — but it’s easy to imagine such a development, if not on the part of the app’s makers than by some enterprising tech vulture. And while the app has begun blocking searches for terms like “sex” and “NSFW,” presumably to avoid violating Apple’s puritanical standards, loads of X-rated material is still available; it’s just harder to find. (One must know which accounts to follow, or get creative with keyword and username searches.) There’s already at least one independent NSFW site compiling naughty vines, and the app’s only been around for a few days.
What makes me ask the question isn’t the fact that users are already using the app for sexual ends — that happens with virtually all new technology — but rather that it hits the sexual sweet spot of our time. Just last month, I wrote about the rise of GIF porn. At the time, I said, “It should come as no surprise, I suppose, that as our thoughts are distilled into 140 characters, our porn is similarly reduced to 256 colors.” Porno-GIFs are more interesting than a photo but require less time investment than a video — and Vine porn only improves upon that formula, better satisfying our desire for high stimulation with low commitment. It’s also way easier to make than a GIF; and it combines recent trends in porn (amateur porn, gonzo clips, tube sites) with the increasing insta-broadcast of every single thing in our lives.
Tracy Clark-Flory is a staff writer at Salon. Follow @tracyclarkflory on Twitter and Facebook.
Excellent work demonstrates
ReplyDelete------------------------------
شركة تنظيف خزانات بحائل
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالجبيل