Father Benedict Groeschel, American Friar,
Claims Teens Seduce Priests In Some Sex Abuse Cases
The Huffington Post | By Meredith Bennett-Smith
In a recent interview with the National Catholic Register, Father Benedict Groeschel, of the conservative Franciscan Friars of the Renewal, said that teens act as seducers in some sexual abuse cases involving priests.
It's been close to decade since an investigation into clergy sex abuse cases by The Boston Globe unearthed a shocking scandal and cover-up that rocked the foundations of the Catholic Church in the U.S. and around the world.
Ten years may have passed, but the wounds have yet to fully heal in America, especially in light of the recent Penn State allegations, as well as the trial of Monsignor William Lynn, former secretary for the clergy in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia.
In light of this, the recent comments by Groeschel seem both puzzling and jarringly out of step with current sentiments.
In an interview with the National Catholic Register posted this week, Groeschel was asked about his work with the very conservative Friars of the Renewal, a breakaway order he founded 25 years ago. The conversation took an interesting turn, however, when the editor asked about the 78-year-old's work with sexual abuse perpetrators.
"People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to — a psychopath," Groeschel said. "But that’s not the case. Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer."
Pressed for clarification, the New York State-based religious leader explained that kids looking for father figures might be drawn to priests to fill a hole.
Furthermore, Groeschel expressed a belief that most of these "relationships" are heterosexual in nature, and that historically sexual relationships between men and boys have not been thought of as crimes.
"If you go back 10 or 15 years ago with different sexual difficulties — except for rape or violence — it was very rarely brought as a civil crime. Nobody thought of it that way... And I’m inclined to think, on [a priest's] first offense, they should not go to jail because their intention was not committing a crime."
The fact that the interview was published, without comment, in the National Catholic Register was significant due to the publication's affiliation with disgraced Legion of Christ religious order.
In 1995 the legion was part of a group of investors who saved the National Catholic Register from closing. The powerful clerical order was also part of one of the most damaging scandals, involving its one-time leader, the Rev. Marcial Maciel, the highest-profile Catholic clergyman ever to be accused of sexual abuse, according to Time magazine.
In 2005, the Vatican scrambled to try to minimize the damage done by revelations that the extremely influential Mexican priest had been abusing seminarians for year.
Groeschel is an influential voice in the American Dioceses and continues to maintain a high-profile in the church, writing several books and appearing weekly on a religious television network.
The priest received a doctorate in psychology from Columbia University in 1971 and now lives in Larchment, N.Y., where he assists with Trinity Retreat, a center for prayer and study for the clergy he founded.
Trinity House stirred controversy in 2006 when the press learned that New York priests credibly accused of sexually abusing children, but not legally convicted, had the option of a life-long close supervision program that began with a stay at the retreat. In the wake of community objections, the Archdiocese later removed Trinity House from the list of program's offered facilities, according to the Larchmont Gazette.
Groeschel is also a professor of pastoral psychology at St. Joseph’s Seminary of the Archdiocese of New York.
COMMENT: The Catholic Church is such a mess. Xianity in general no longer effectively exists in the West. The right, the conservatives, nominal Xians at best, are guided by compassionless objectivism, while the left sees belief in a compassionate god as primitive, embraces Science as a god, and flounders in moral relativism.
I grew up as a Catholic. Trained by Jesuits:) My values come from the New Testament and can be summed up in one word: compassion. The religious discussion in this country at least is not at all focused on the NT message; rather, it's all about sex. Values seem to arise from dark bits and pieces of the Old Testament, especially Leviticus. In the "enlightened" coastal progressive communities I rarely hear animated talk about, say, the Sermon on the Mount. Rather folks go on about how happy they are to masturbate and fuck freely now that they've renounced religion and god. On the right they go on about Xian values, meaning, as far as I can see, right to life and "defense" of marriage. Nothing, again, about treating others as you would like to be treated yourself. For them Xianity is somehow wrapped up with a notion of personal freedom without responsibility.
My personal problem with belief in the Church is basically this: after 2000 years of Xianity nothing has changed, fundamentally, in the way humans treat each other and the world around them. People bash each other for personal gain and happily soil the world around them. I see no New Testament values in action.
As for god or gods, I just don't know. When I remove myself from the "connectivity" and "me" focus of modern America I do sense that I belong to something vast and incomprehensible; an unquantifiable spirit than is shared by all living things. I used to have this knowledge of what truly is on the dancefloor. I have labeled this ecstatic understanding of the universal one...for my own purposes. Institutions don't seem to be able to communicate these concepts. The old Catholic church with it's ancient rituals and sense of mystery did this the best, I think, but that was lost in the rush for relevance. So we have our full moon and other rituals in our home. I still search for connection with the universal though the constant battle for survival these days makes success here almost impossible. I do know this: the new religion Science can neither prove nor disprove the existence of god or another spiritual realm. Like religion, Science promises eternal life some day as well as Truth. Science doesn't seem to produce, however, much happiness.
I grew up as a Catholic. Trained by Jesuits:) My values come from the New Testament and can be summed up in one word: compassion. The religious discussion in this country at least is not at all focused on the NT message; rather, it's all about sex. Values seem to arise from dark bits and pieces of the Old Testament, especially Leviticus. In the "enlightened" coastal progressive communities I rarely hear animated talk about, say, the Sermon on the Mount. Rather folks go on about how happy they are to masturbate and fuck freely now that they've renounced religion and god. On the right they go on about Xian values, meaning, as far as I can see, right to life and "defense" of marriage. Nothing, again, about treating others as you would like to be treated yourself. For them Xianity is somehow wrapped up with a notion of personal freedom without responsibility.
My personal problem with belief in the Church is basically this: after 2000 years of Xianity nothing has changed, fundamentally, in the way humans treat each other and the world around them. People bash each other for personal gain and happily soil the world around them. I see no New Testament values in action.
As for god or gods, I just don't know. When I remove myself from the "connectivity" and "me" focus of modern America I do sense that I belong to something vast and incomprehensible; an unquantifiable spirit than is shared by all living things. I used to have this knowledge of what truly is on the dancefloor. I have labeled this ecstatic understanding of the universal one...for my own purposes. Institutions don't seem to be able to communicate these concepts. The old Catholic church with it's ancient rituals and sense of mystery did this the best, I think, but that was lost in the rush for relevance. So we have our full moon and other rituals in our home. I still search for connection with the universal though the constant battle for survival these days makes success here almost impossible. I do know this: the new religion Science can neither prove nor disprove the existence of god or another spiritual realm. Like religion, Science promises eternal life some day as well as Truth. Science doesn't seem to produce, however, much happiness.