(Hint: It Could Be You)
A dishy book from an avowed sociopath has stirred up an awkward debate: perhaps all of us have a bit of the personality disorder. Caitlin Dickson on why that may not be such a bad thing.
M.E.
Thomas describes herself as a cutthroat attorney who sailed through law
school without much effort, landed a position at a prestigious law
firm, and then became a professor. She also claims to fantasize about
murder, drops friends when their personal problems get in the way of her
fun, and plots ways to “ruin people” in her spare time. She straddles a
fine line between success and failure, with the traits that have gotten
her ahead simultaneously contributing to her periodic downfalls.
M.E. Thomas is a sociopath. And you might be one, too.
In her new book, Confessions of a Sociopath,
Thomas, writing under a pseudonym that pokes fun at her narcissism,
removes her mask of carefully crafted personality traits in an attempt
to prove that sociopathy is not simply a disorder of serial killers but
one that exists on a spectrum, plaguing to varying degrees a large
portion of successful, apparently well-adjusted people.
Thomas is not the first to make this point, but hers is certainly the most personal argument yet. In her 2005 book The Sociopath Next Door, psychologist
Martha Stout warned that sociopaths make up four percent of the U.S.
population; last spring, journalist Jon Ronson detailed his search for
psychopathy from prisons to boardrooms in The Psychopath Test. (Psychopathy, more or less, is the clinical term for sociopathy, and the two are often used interchangeably.) A September 2012 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ranked
U.S. presidents in order of their possession of a psychopathic trait
called “fearless dominance,” with Teddy Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy
topping the list.
Sociopathy
is a personality disorder that manifests itself in such traits as
dishonesty, charm, manipulation, narcissism, and a lack of both remorse
and impulse control. In 1980, criminal psychologist Robert Hare
developed the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), the universally
heralded method for diagnosing psychopathy—used most often to determine
whether a criminal is suitable for parole or poses such a danger to
society that he deserves the death penalty. But Hare doesn’t believe
psychopathy is confined to the prison system. In fact, quite the
opposite: two years ago, Ronson quoted
Hare’s assessment that “you’re four times more likely to find a
psychopath at the top of the corporate ladder than you are walking
around the janitor’s office.”
Notorious
serial killer Ted Bundy is typically thought of as the psychopathic
poster child, but experts point to Bernie Madoff as a better real-life
example of someone on the spectrum. In a February 2011 interview with New York magazine,
Madoff recalled asking his prison therapist whether she thought he was a
sociopath. “You’re absolutely not a sociopath,” she reportedly told
him. “You have morals. You have remorse.” True, Madoff may indeed have
regretted losing $65 billion for thousands of investors, hedge funds,
and charities across the world, disgracing and betraying his family so
severely that one of his sons committed suicide. But to be able to
manipulate all those people for a financial reward takes a certain
degree of callousness, dishonesty, and lack of impulse control that are
intrinsic to psychopathy.
“I am naturally manipulative. I have a tendency to indulge in self-deception.”
In
her book, Thomas writes that she loathed her father, never cried when
he beat her with his belt, and that “the first recurring dream I can
remember was about killing him with my bare hands.” He’s not the only
person she’s fantasized about murdering. Thomas describes becoming
consumed by a desire to stalk down and strangle a D.C. Metro worker who
scolded her for using a closed elevator, as well as a teenage attempt to
drown a baby opossum when she could have rescued it from the pool it
had fallen into.
But
Thomas isn’t an actual killer—and she and other researchers emphasize
that most sociopaths aren’t killers either. Instead, Thomas says her
favorite preferred sociopathic pastime is “ruining people.” Her book
details the time she has spent going out of her way to toy with other
people’s emotions. “I know my heart is blacker and colder than most
people’s; maybe that’s why it’s tempting to break theirs,” she writes.
Stephanie
Mullins-Sweatt, an assistant psychology professor at Oklahoma State
University, has done research on so-called successful sociopaths—i.e.,
those who aren’t imprisoned. “If someone is on the extreme end of the
spectrum, that’s bad, we want to limit their damage to society,” Sweatt
says. “But I wouldn’t necessarily say that if someone is an extreme
psychopath they are going to kill someone.”
John
Edens, a psychology professor at Texas A&M, evaluated Thomas when
her literary agent suggested she get diagnosed before turning her blog,
SociopathWorld.com, into a book. It’s extremely rare for a sociopath to
seek a clinical evaluation without a court order, and women are
especially subject to misdiagnosis because of the lack of research on
the disorder outside the prison system. So Edens had to use a variety of
tests—including a screening version of the Hare PCL-R—before coming to
the conclusion that she is, in fact, a sociopath. And while he’s
confident in his diagnosis, he argues that “saying someone is a
psychopath or not is drawing a bit of an arbitrary line in the sand,”
suggesting that all people likely possess a certain amount of
sociopathic traits, some just more pronounced than others.
So
how do you solve a problem like a sociopath? While hardened inmates are
required to undergo cognitive behavioral therapy to learn how not to
end up back in jail, there’s virtually no known treatment for ruthless,
manipulative, law-abiding citizens who lack empathy. And, really, should
there be? These are traits that are often attributed to success, from
the soldier who can come back from the frontlines without PTSD to the
top surgeon who may lack in bedside manner but will save a life no
matter the cost and the Wall Street investor willing to make a major
gamble for a momentous reward.
Thomas says she advises any potential sociopath who contacts her through her website against getting diagnosed, warning that, with no treatment available outside of prison therapy, the only real benefit of knowing is peace of mind—if that.
Thomas says she advises any potential sociopath who contacts her through her website against getting diagnosed, warning that, with no treatment available outside of prison therapy, the only real benefit of knowing is peace of mind—if that.
In
lieu of therapy, Thomas has discovered some alternatives to treatment.
For one, she credits Mormonism, specifically its doctrine that anyone
can change and its required social engagements, with keeping her on
track. Her blog is also therapeutic. By posting and responding daily to
articles on sociopathy, she’s essentially forced to analyze her own
behavior and decisions on a regular basis.
“I
think one of the things that’s been my downfall in the past is when I
start thinking that I’m normal and fine and that when something happens
it’s someone else’s fault,” she said. “I have to remind myself that I am
this way. I am naturally manipulative. I have a tendency to indulge in
self-deception.”
And
by engaging with her potentially sociopathic readers, Thomas has found a
subculture of similarly antisocial people with whom she can play her
favorite manipulative games without destroying friendships. After all,
as Sweatt put it, sociopaths are mostly “problematic in terms of the
stress they cause other people.”
Lauren,
who asked not to use her real name to protect Thomas’s identity, was
the first person to suggest Thomas might be a sociopath. While interning
together one summer during law school, Thomas admitted to studying
other people’s behavior for clues on how to act and expressed
frustration over a friend whose close family member had died. Thomas
wasn’t distraught or upset that she couldn’t do anything to make the
situation better—she was annoyed that her friend had become less fun and
entertaining to be around. When she read the book, Lauren was shocked
to learn of the cruel games Thomas had played with other people and
relieved that she had never been the target of her friend’s
manipulation. Living in different cities and maintaining a mostly
intellectual relationship has allowed the two to stay friends. But if
Thomas ever tried to “ruin” Lauren like she has others, Lauren says
she’d have to cut her out of her life.
“She
certainly isn’t someone I’d call crying after a breakup ... but I grew
up gay in a conservative place and I know what it’s like to be rejected
for who you are,” said Lauren. “Her ultimate goal is to be out as a
sociopath, accepted by society and not vilified. I can relate to that.”
But
being “out” doesn’t seem to have proved as liberating as Thomas had
hoped. A law professor at the time of publication, Thomas now describes
her employment situation as “up in the air,” indicating that her bosses
are weighing whether they want a sociopath working for them. Because
Thomas would not reveal her real identity or the name of her school, The
Daily Beast could not confirm this with her employer. But with regard
to whether Thomas could legally be fired for coming clean, employment
attorney Jessica Kastin explained that Thomas would probably have a very
hard time making the case that she was being discriminated against
because of her disorder.
“For
a disability to be covered under the Americans With Disability Act, it
has to substantially limit one or more major life activities,” Kastin
explained. “I’m not a doctor, but I think it would be hard to show that
being a sociopath would affect a major life activity. My understanding
is that sociopaths could function fine.”
Thomas
says that every two to three years she experiences what she calls a
“life destruction,” the periodic dissolution of a job and or
relationships caused by one too many lies or manipulations. It was after
one of these episodes in 2008 that Thomas started the blog, deciding
for the first time to look inward for the source of her problems. Now,
the reaction to her book is making her wonder if she may be going
through yet another life destruction right now.
“I
thought about the fact that this could happen before writing the book,
but I hoped it wouldn’t,” she said. “I thought the book might open up
other avenues, so if this did happen I would have greater success. It
was a calculated risk and right now it looks bad, like I miscalculated.”
But, true to sociopathic form, Thomas displayed a disregard for
consequences. “Unlike before, I’m fine if this is a period of
self-destruction because I don’t think I did anything wrong this time.”
No comments:
Post a Comment